baby care nl image
Q. Liberals think of the decline of the Mayans or the Aztecs as great tragedy's, they hate what's happening in Tibet but in Europe they don't care that soon France will be Arabia and that in cities such as Amsterdam and Malmo non-Europeans will be the majority.
Are liberals biased against Europe because Europeans are white.
Yes you are self hating whites, its a pathetic disease.
Are liberals biased against Europe because Europeans are white.
Yes you are self hating whites, its a pathetic disease.
Answer
Rico - If Europeans become a minority in Europe, European culture is gone. Why is that so hard to understand?
Billy Blaze - LIAR, LIAR, LIAR!
OVER ONE THIRD OF BABIES BORN IN ENGLAND ARE NON-WHITE.
http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/uncategorized/over-a-third-of-babies-born-in-england-wales-are-non-white_10090438.html
THE LARGEST IMMIGRANT GROUP IN MALMO ARE IRAQIS.
http://malmo.se/Kommun--politik/Om-oss/Statistik-om-Malmo/02.-Utlandsk-bakgrund/Malmobor-fodda-i-utlandet-per-land.html
HALF OF ALL BABIES BORN IN AMSTERDAM ARE TO NON-WHITE PARENTS.
http://www.cbs.nl/en-GB/menu/themas/bevolking/publicaties/artikelen/archief/2004/2004-1443-wm.htm
Don't believe the left wing lies, protecting white culture is not hate, the hatred is towards whites.
Rico - If Europeans become a minority in Europe, European culture is gone. Why is that so hard to understand?
Billy Blaze - LIAR, LIAR, LIAR!
OVER ONE THIRD OF BABIES BORN IN ENGLAND ARE NON-WHITE.
http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/uncategorized/over-a-third-of-babies-born-in-england-wales-are-non-white_10090438.html
THE LARGEST IMMIGRANT GROUP IN MALMO ARE IRAQIS.
http://malmo.se/Kommun--politik/Om-oss/Statistik-om-Malmo/02.-Utlandsk-bakgrund/Malmobor-fodda-i-utlandet-per-land.html
HALF OF ALL BABIES BORN IN AMSTERDAM ARE TO NON-WHITE PARENTS.
http://www.cbs.nl/en-GB/menu/themas/bevolking/publicaties/artikelen/archief/2004/2004-1443-wm.htm
Don't believe the left wing lies, protecting white culture is not hate, the hatred is towards whites.
What is the Probability Of Having Twins, Triplets, Quadruplets, Quintuplets, Sextuplets?
What's the probablitly of having twins, or Triplets, or Quadruplets, or Quintuplets, or Sextuplets???
Answer
Very good summary:
http://www.babiesonline.com/articles/pregnancy/probabilityoftwins.asp
So, AGE, HEREDITY. Also note that ethnicity plays a factor. women of African decent have a higher incident of twinning than do women of Aryan or Asian descent. (Hispanic is just a combo of Aryan and Asian). See this interesting article
http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=2093233
There are also three types of triplets: three placentas two and one.
A single placental would mean one egg divided into three babies. They will likely all be deformed, genetically defetive, conjoined or die. This is highly unlikely!
Two placentas: two eggs drop, one divides into twins. So you effectively have one fraternal twin and two idential twins. Rare as well, but can produe three healthy babies. If someone is a triplette and born before 1980, they are undoubtedly a natural birth. In which case twinning likely runs in the woman's family.
Three placentas: in many cases a result of hormone treatment. Live births larger than tripletts are EXTREMEMLY rare in the natural world. They are ften viewed very negatively. After all they are more likely to kill the mother and/or produce inviable offspring with many health issues. They are very unnatural. Although it has happened in several historial cases, the families are often treated with more contempt than anything else.
Why? Because a single mother cannot care for and nurse more than three babies at a time. She will invariable be a lousy mom to them all. The likelihood that one or all will die or she will kill them from exhaustion is too high. Multiples of that high a degree would ostensiably require an inordinate amount of attention from all the other mothers in the "villiage" and prevent them from caring for their own genetic offspring. Trust me.. in nature "God" does not often give women litters.
I woud say that if someone had more than one set of twins it is a clear sign of a healthy genetic propensity to have multiple simultaneous ovulations, to carry those babies to term and to effectively care for those children. If someone steps up with quads or more, they are likely a result of human engineering, and therefore a sign of BAD genetics being propagated through science.
Also, all multiples negatively affet the parent's ability to provide initial life care and to allocate resouces to the child. One always takes away form the other even after such time as they're able to independently provide attention and protection for one another. Here's another intersting article o the subject:
http://www.tinbergen.nl/cost/london/caceres.pdf
Overall the probablility of twins is about 3%.. I think tripletts may be lessthan 1% anythign above that is insignifiant unless you're taking meds.
Very good summary:
http://www.babiesonline.com/articles/pregnancy/probabilityoftwins.asp
So, AGE, HEREDITY. Also note that ethnicity plays a factor. women of African decent have a higher incident of twinning than do women of Aryan or Asian descent. (Hispanic is just a combo of Aryan and Asian). See this interesting article
http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=2093233
There are also three types of triplets: three placentas two and one.
A single placental would mean one egg divided into three babies. They will likely all be deformed, genetically defetive, conjoined or die. This is highly unlikely!
Two placentas: two eggs drop, one divides into twins. So you effectively have one fraternal twin and two idential twins. Rare as well, but can produe three healthy babies. If someone is a triplette and born before 1980, they are undoubtedly a natural birth. In which case twinning likely runs in the woman's family.
Three placentas: in many cases a result of hormone treatment. Live births larger than tripletts are EXTREMEMLY rare in the natural world. They are ften viewed very negatively. After all they are more likely to kill the mother and/or produce inviable offspring with many health issues. They are very unnatural. Although it has happened in several historial cases, the families are often treated with more contempt than anything else.
Why? Because a single mother cannot care for and nurse more than three babies at a time. She will invariable be a lousy mom to them all. The likelihood that one or all will die or she will kill them from exhaustion is too high. Multiples of that high a degree would ostensiably require an inordinate amount of attention from all the other mothers in the "villiage" and prevent them from caring for their own genetic offspring. Trust me.. in nature "God" does not often give women litters.
I woud say that if someone had more than one set of twins it is a clear sign of a healthy genetic propensity to have multiple simultaneous ovulations, to carry those babies to term and to effectively care for those children. If someone steps up with quads or more, they are likely a result of human engineering, and therefore a sign of BAD genetics being propagated through science.
Also, all multiples negatively affet the parent's ability to provide initial life care and to allocate resouces to the child. One always takes away form the other even after such time as they're able to independently provide attention and protection for one another. Here's another intersting article o the subject:
http://www.tinbergen.nl/cost/london/caceres.pdf
Overall the probablility of twins is about 3%.. I think tripletts may be lessthan 1% anythign above that is insignifiant unless you're taking meds.
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar